Viability and characterization trial of a novel method as an alternative to formaldehyde and Walter-Thiel cadaveric preservation for medical education and surgical simulation / Viabilidad y prueba de caracterización de un nuevo método como alternativa al formaldehído y la solución de Walther-Thiel para la preservación de cadáveres para educación médica y simulación quirúrgica

Introduction Despite its toxic and carcinogenic nature, formaldehyde is a widely used reactant for specimen preservation. With the need of specimens for both anatomical and surgical training, alternative preservation solutions (PS) have been proposed, however, their use is limited due to high costs and complexity. Hence, a new formaldehyde-free solution (FFS) is evaluated as a potential alternative for anatomical and surgical training. Methods Qualitative and Quantitative data were acquired. Specimens preserved using three different methods were selected. Flexibility was measured by joints goniometry and pneumoperitoneum pressures were evaluated followed by an exploratory laparoscopy. Undergraduate student's perceptions on cadavers preserved with different PS were obtained using surveys and focus groups. Results The main reason why cadaveric specimens were considered as useful tools was the perceived interaction with real tissues and the ‘practical’ concept of getting in touch with what students would be facing in the future as physicians, what we call “hands on” activities. FFS treated specimens showed better joint-movement ranges in comparison to other methods and pneumoperitoneum was acquired after 5mmHg CO2 pressure. Students appreciated working with corpses regardless the technique used, however FFS specimens were defined as less uncomfortable, while presenting no sensory discomfort. Conclusions Even though alternative PS are effective, high costs and complexity restrict their usage. Cadavers preserved with FFS had similar range of movements compared with Thiel. Students preferred to work with FFS rather than FF due to flexibility, color, and no sensorial hassles. Thus, we propose FFS as viable alternative to traditional PS (AU)

Introducción A pesar de su naturaleza carcinogénica y tóxica, el formaldehido continúa siendo utilizado para preservar especímenes. Debido a la necesidad de especímenes para entrenamiento anatómico y quirúrgico, se han propuesto soluciones preservadoras (SP) alternativas; sin embargo, su uso es limitado debido a los altos costos y a su complejidad. En consecuencia, se evalúa una nueva solución libre de formol (FFS) como una alternativa para el uso en entrenamiento anatómico y quirúrgico. Métodos Se obtuvieron datos cualitativos y cuantitativos. Se seleccionaron especímenes preservados utilizando diferentes métodos y se analizaron biopsias de cada uno. Se midió la flexibilidad mediante goniometría, y se evaluó la presión del neumoperitoneo. Utilizando encuestas y grupos focales se obtuvo la percepción de estudiantes de pregrado respecto a cadáveres preservados con diferentes soluciones. Resultados Los principales motivos por los que los estudiantes refirieron percibir los cadáveres como herramientas útiles fueron poder interactuar con tejidos reales y el concepto de «practicidad» generado por actividades percibidas como similares a la práctica como médicos profesionales. Los especímenes tratados con FFS demostraron mejor movimiento articular en comparación con otras soluciones, además de lograr neumoperitoneo con 5mmHg de CO2. Los estudiantes refirieron sentir menos molestias sensoriales al utilizar cadáveres preservados con FFS. Conclusiones Aunque otras SP son efectivas, los altos costos y la complejidad restringen su uso. Cadáveres preservados con FFS presentan arcos de movimiento similares a Thiel. Los estudiantes prefirieron trabajar con FFS en vez de FF, debido a la flexibilidad, el color y la ausencia de molestias sensoriales. Proponemos FFS como una alternativa viable a las SP tradicionales (AU)

Viability and characterization trial of a novel method as an alternative to formaldehyde and Walter-Thiel cadaveric preservation for medical education and surgical simulation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its toxic and carcinogenic nature, formaldehyde is a widely used reactant for specimen preservation. With the need of specimens for both anatomical and surgical training, alternative preservation solutions (PS) have been proposed, however, their use is limited due to high costs and complexity. Hence, a new formaldehyde-free solution (FFS) is evaluated as a potential alternative for anatomical and surgical training. METHODS: Qualitative and Quantitative data were acquired. Specimens preserved using three different methods were selected. Flexibility was measured by joints goniometry and pneumoperitoneum pressures were evaluated followed by an exploratory laparoscopy. Undergraduate student's perceptions on cadavers preserved with different PS were obtained using surveys and focus groups. RESULTS: The main reason why cadaveric specimens were considered as useful tools was the perceived interaction with real tissues and the 'practical' concept of getting in touch with what students would be facing in the future as physicians, what we call "hands on" activities. FFS treated specimens showed better joint-movement ranges in comparison to other methods and pneumoperitoneum was acquired after 5mmHg CO2 pressure. Students appreciated working with corpses regardless the technique used, however FFS specimens were defined as less uncomfortable, while presenting no sensory discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Even though alternative PS are effective, high costs and complexity restrict their usage. Cadavers preserved with FFS had similar range of movements compared with Thiel. Students preferred to work with FFS rather than FF due to flexibility, color, and no sensorial hassles. Thus, we propose FFS as viable alternative to traditional PS.

Viability and characterization trial of a novel method as an alternative to formaldehyde and Walter-Thiel cadaveric preservation for medical education and surgical simulation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its toxic and carcinogenic nature, formaldehyde is a widely used reactant for specimen preservation. With the need of specimens for both anatomical and surgical training, alternative preservation solutions (PS) have been proposed, however, their use is limited due to high costs and complexity. Hence, a new formaldehyde-free solution (FFS) is evaluated as a potential alternative for anatomical and surgical training. METHODS: Qualitative and Quantitative data were acquired. Specimens preserved using three different methods were selected. Flexibility was measured by joints goniometry and pneumoperitoneum pressures were evaluated followed by an exploratory laparoscopy. Undergraduate student's perceptions on cadavers preserved with different PS were obtained using surveys and focus groups. RESULTS: The main reason why cadaveric specimens were considered as useful tools was the perceived interaction with real tissues and the 'practical' concept of getting in touch with what students would be facing in the future as physicians, what we call "hands on" activities. FFS treated specimens showed better joint-movement ranges in comparison to other methods and pneumoperitoneum was acquired after 5mmHg CO2 pressure. Students appreciated working with corpses regardless the technique used, however FFS specimens were defined as less uncomfortable, while presenting no sensory discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Even though alternative PS are effective, high costs and complexity restrict their usage. Cadavers preserved with FFS had similar range of movements compared with Thiel. Students preferred to work with FFS rather than FF due to flexibility, color, and no sensorial hassles. Thus, we propose FFS as viable alternative to traditional PS.